When job applicants stroll into The Finish
Line, a computer gives them their first interview -- and
sometimes their last.
The sporting-goods retail chain is among the growing
number of companies embracing a new breed of workplace
testing aimed at sizing up whether the personalities of job
applicants fit with the positions being sought. Depending on
how strongly the test-takers agree or disagree with
statements like, "You love to listen to people talk about
themselves," the computer makes some snap judgments.
At the Finish Line, high scores on qualities such as
sociability and initiative earn applicants a seal of
approval, enabling them to proceed to interviews with human
managers.
Psychological testing has gained sway at an estimated 40
percent of large U.S. companies, evaluating everyone from
hourly employees to top executives, experts say. Businesses
such as fast-food giant McDonald's Corp. swear by predictive
tests, saying they reduce turnover and boost productivity
and sales. Companies spend $400 million annually on
employment tests of all kinds.
"I wouldn't hire anybody without one, not any more," said
Jack Harms, a Milwaukee-based marketing consultant who uses
a 10-minute test to screen corporate sales execs. "In my
experience, it's never missed."
Yet critics say the unregulated industry subjects tens of
millions to decisions that are little better than coin
tosses. Psychologists long have debated whether personality
can be reduced to mathematics and whether the power of
situations is a bigger factor than personality in
determining behavior.
"The best predictor of how someone will behave on the job
is usually what they've done before -- their record of
achievements and not how they answer a test," said Annie
Murphy Paul, author of a book that concludes even widely
used tests fail to meet basic benchmarks for reliability.
The allure of a simple quantitative system is plain: Bad
hires are expensive. On average, businesses spend the
equivalent of one year's salary to recruit and train an
employee.
Among the factors driving the testing industry's growth
is Internet technology, which makes mass assessments much
quicker and less expensive.
Society's tolerance for psychological probing has
increased since the Sept. 11 terror attacks, and
corporations have grown more rigorous about succession
planning and ethics checks.
"People are beginning to realize that screening for
thinking style, cultural fit and emotional fit is really
important," said Gary Hourihan, president of executive
recruiter Korn/Ferry International's 3-year-old assessment
business.
Hourihan claims his firm's Web-based tools have been
validated in clinical trials that observe employees to see
whether their behavior is consistent with their assessments.
"Eighty-five percent will be nailed precisely by the
online instrument," he said.
About 2,500 U.S. firms offer tests that purport to
identify traits or behaviors that can be related to job
requirements. Credible players publish research showing
their tests are valid. They also do research to make sure
their assessments are valid at the companies where the tests
are being used.
The appeal of people-sorting mechanisms is powerful.
Witness the popularity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator,
an assessment system that has been largely discredited as a
hiring tool but is widely used in training and development.
The system scores people on how they approach the world
using categories such as introversion/extroversion and
thinking/feeling and assigns a four-letter acronym that
summarizes their personality. An introverted, sensing,
thinking, judging person would be an "ISTJ."
Associates at consultant McKinsey & Co. "often know their
colleagues' four-letter M.B.T.I. types by heart," Paul
writes in her book, "The Cult of Personality, How
Personality Tests Are Leading Us to Miseducate Our Children,
Mismanage Our Companies, and Misunderstand Ourselves."
"I can't tell you how many business people come up to me
because someone has given them Myers-Briggs, telling me, I'm
a 'this' or 'that"' type, said psychologist Leigh
Thompson, J. Jay Gerber distinguished professor at
Northwestern University's Kellogg School of Management.
"No academicians worth their salt would put any stock in
it," she said.